Our 108-18 Queens Blvd office is moving to 75-60 188th St, Flushing NY 11366
We've moved! Now located at 75-60 188th Street Fresh Meadows, NY 11366

COMMON DEFENSES USED BY TRUCKING COMPANIES IN PERSONAL INJURY LAWSUITS

This page was written, edited, reviewed & approved by Ruben Davidoff following our comprehensive editorial guidelines Ruben Davidoff ,the Founding Partner, has 30+ years of legal experience as a New York personal injury attorney.

By: Ruben DavidoffAugust 1, 2023,

Personal injury lawsuits involving commercial trucks can be complex and challenging. These cases often have high stakes for both the injured parties seeking compensation and the trucking companies defending against potential liability. The following are the common defenses used by trucking companies facing personal injury lawsuits.

Comparative Negligence

One of the primary defenses employed by trucking companies is the argument of comparative negligence. This defense asserts that the injured party shares some responsibility for the accident that caused their injuries. The trucking company may try to demonstrate that the plaintiff's actions, such as speeding, distracted driving, or failure to obey traffic signals, contributed to the accident's occurrence or severity. If the court finds the plaintiff partially at fault, the compensation awarded may be reduced proportionately to the percentage of fault assigned to them.

Statute of Limitations

Trucking companies may also attempt to use the statute of limitations defense. This defense asserts that the injured party filed the lawsuit after the legal deadline for doing so had passed. Each jurisdiction has specific statutes of limitations governing personal injury claims, and missing the deadline can result in the case being dismissed entirely. Therefore, it is crucial for injured parties to seek legal counsel promptly after an accident to ensure compliance with the relevant time limits.

Independent Contractor Status

Trucking companies often hire truck drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This distinction allows the company to avoid liability for the driver's actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior, which holds employers responsible for their employees' actions within the scope of employment. By arguing that the driver is an independent contractor, the trucking company may attempt to shield itself from liability, claiming that the driver's actions are not their responsibility.

Lack of Negligence

Trucking companies might dispute any claims of negligence on their part. They may argue that they have taken all reasonable measures to ensure their drivers' training, vehicle maintenance, and adherence to safety regulations. To back up this defense, they may present documentation of safety protocols, driver training records, and regular vehicle inspections to demonstrate their commitment to safety.

Sudden Emergency Doctrine

The sudden emergency doctrine is another defense used by trucking companies. It asserts that the truck driver faced an unexpected and unforeseeable emergency situation, leaving them with little time to react appropriately. In such cases, the driver may not be held liable for any resulting injuries if their actions, or lack thereof, were reasonable under the circumstances.

Pre-existing Conditions

Trucking companies might scrutinize the plaintiff's medical history and assert that the injuries sustained in the accident were not entirely caused by the trucking accident but instead were exacerbated by pre-existing medical conditions. They may argue that the plaintiff's injuries were a result of a previous accident, degenerative condition, or unrelated medical issue.

Inadequate Proof of Damages

Trucking companies might challenge the plaintiff's evidence of damages, including medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. They may dispute the extent of the injuries or claim that some of the damages were not related to the accident. To counter this defense, it is essential for the injured party to gather thorough documentation and expert testimony to support their claims.

Settlement Offers

Lastly, trucking companies may use settlement offers as a defense strategy. They might make an early settlement offer to the injured party in hopes of avoiding lengthy litigation. In some cases, the offer may be tempting, but it is crucial for the injured party to consult with their attorney before accepting any settlement. Early settlement offers often do not fully account for the long-term consequences of the injuries and may not provide adequate compensation for future medical costs or lost earning potential.

Tips to Counter the Comparative Negligence Defense

1. Gather Strong Evidence:

To counter the comparative negligence defense, it is crucial to collect and preserve evidence that supports your claim of the trucking company's negligence. This may include photographs of the accident scene, eyewitness testimonies, medical records, and expert opinions.

2. Consult an Experienced Attorney:

Personal injury cases involving trucking companies can be complex. An experienced attorney specializing in trucking accidents can help assess the strength of your case, navigate legal complexities, and build a robust argument against the comparative negligence defense.

3. Prove the Trucking Company's Negligence:

To minimize the impact of the comparative negligence defense, it is essential to establish that the trucking company's negligence was the primary cause of the accident. This can be achieved by demonstrating violations of federal trucking regulations, inadequate driver training, improper maintenance, or failure to comply with industry safety standards.

4. Understand State Laws:

Comparative negligence laws vary from state to state. Familiarize yourself with the specific laws in your jurisdiction to understand how they may affect your case. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney can provide you with valuable guidance tailored to your unique circumstances.

5. Preserve Your Credibility:

Your credibility as a plaintiff is crucial when defending against comparative negligence. Be honest and consistent in your statements, adhere to medical treatments, and avoid discussing the case on social media platforms.

At Davidoff Law, we understand the complexities involved in personal injury lawsuits against trucking companies. Our team of skilled attorneys has a proven track record of successfully countering the comparative negligence defense. We are committed to fighting for your rights and ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve.

If you have been injured in a truck accident, don't hesitate to contact us for a free consultation. Our expertise and dedication will help you navigate through the legal process, protect your interests, and pursue the justice you deserve.

Davidoff Law Personal Injury Lawyers

Davidoff Law Personal Injury Lawyers - New York City

APPOINTMENT ONLY

Davidoff Law Personal Injury Lawyers - Bronx

Queens Personal Injury Lawyer Ruben Davidoff

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Personal Injury Lawyer

Ruben Davidoff, founder of Davidoff Law, established his practice in 2012 after moving to Queens in 1988 and beginning his legal career in 1997. Admitted in NY State and the US District Court for the Eastern District of NY, he has extensive experience in personal injury, handling various cases like airline crashes, auto accidents, and slip/trip and fall cases. Mr. Davidoff provides personalized attention, recovering millions for clients through settlements or verdicts, leveraging decades of experience.

Contact Us

If you or a loved one needs the assistance of our personal injury law attorneys, please feel free to contact in the way that is most convenient to you, whether that is calling us at (718) 268-8800 or completing the contact form below. All fields are required.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*
Required Field*
Consent
chevron-down